Recomputed every morning · 2026-10-09
What AI evals roles advertise
Compare published pay, straight from the 556 live job postings that advertise an annual USD base band, across 99 companies. These are the bands employers advertise, not what anybody is paid.
Board snapshot: 2026-10-09 · 1110 live roles across 174 employers. The salary sample above is the subset with comparable published pay.
$220k – $330k
The median advertised band. A quarter of these postings sit below $225k at the midpoint, a quarter above $350k. The full range runs from $55k to $930k.
Find the roles that advertise your number
Choose a shortcut or enter your target. Matches have an advertised annual USD base maximum that reaches that number; this is not a guaranteed offer. Hourly rates, other currencies and on-target pay are excluded.
Free. One email on Thursdays.
How much do AI evals jobs pay?
Across 556 open listings with comparable annual USD base bands on 2026-10-09, the median advertised minimum is USD 220,000 and the median advertised maximum is USD 330,000. These are medians of two endpoints, not measured earnings or a salary promised to an applicant.
How does pay differ by discipline?
Each row uses at least three listings. Seniority, employer and location can differ between groups, so this is a description of current vacancies, not a controlled pay comparison.
- Alignment & interpretability: USD 265,000–440,000 per year, median advertised endpoints across 41 listings.
- Post-training & RL: USD 241,200–400,000 per year, median advertised endpoints across 141 listings.
- Red team & safeguards: USD 285,000–350,000 per year, median advertised endpoints across 80 listings.
- Evals & benchmarks: USD 210,000–310,000 per year, median advertised endpoints across 222 listings.
- Eval tooling: USD 180,000–240,000 per year, median advertised endpoints across 13 listings.
- Human data: USD 150,000–230,000 per year, median advertised endpoints across 59 listings.
Are AI trainer hourly rates included?
No. Hourly rates, other currencies and variable compensation are excluded from this annual USD comparison. See AI trainer jobs and hourly pay for that separate market. Published rates do not guarantee a supply of paid hours.
To assess an offer, compare the role’s level, location, base pay and any equity separately. Use the filters below to find the corresponding open jobs, then confirm the terms on the employer’s application page.
How does your base compare with what these roles advertise?
Type your current base and the page compares it with the midpoint of each of the 556 live postings on this board that advertise an annual USD base band. This is a comparison against advertised bands, not against what people in these roles are actually paid, which no posting discloses.
The sample is the roles open on this board today that advertise an annual USD base band. Advertised base only: equity and bonus are excluded, and no posting says what anyone is actually paid. Your number is never sent anywhere, this runs entirely in your browser.
Alignment & interpretability has the highest advertised median midpoint
A $150k gap separates it from human data at the bottom. These cohorts differ in employer, location and seniority; this is a description of advertised bands, not a pay premium for choosing a discipline.
By company
Companies with at least three published bands. The bar spans their lowest advertised floor to their highest advertised ceiling, so a wide bar means they hire across a wide seniority range, not that any one role pays that spread. Rows marked nonprofit cannot grant equity, so the band you see is not missing a stock component. Other employers may also offer equity or bonuses; those amounts are not included here.
The highest bands on the board
| Role | Company | Band |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist | Resolution | $141k – $930k |
| Research Engineer | Resolution | $141k – $930k |
| Research Scientist (Philosophy) | Resolution | $236k – $930k |
| Research Engineer, Chip Design RL (Reinforcement Learning) | Anthropic | $500k – $850k |
| Research Engineer, Code RL (Reinforcement Learning) | Anthropic | $500k – $850k |
| Research Engineer, Computer Use | Anthropic | $500k – $850k |
| Research Engineer, Cybersecurity RL (Reinforcement Learning) | Anthropic | $500k – $850k |
| Research Engineer, Discovery | Anthropic | $350k – $850k |
The bands are so wide they barely mean anything
These are single job postings, not seniority ladders. A range this wide tells a candidate almost nothing about what the offer will be, which is worth knowing before you spend a week interviewing.
| Role | Company | Band | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist | Resolution | $141k – $930k | $789k |
| Research Engineer | Resolution | $141k – $930k | $789k |
| Research Scientist (Philosophy) | Resolution | $236k – $930k | $694k |
| Research Engineer, Discovery | Anthropic | $350k – $850k | $500k |
| Research Engineer, Knowledge Team | Anthropic | $350k – $850k | $500k |
34% mention equity in the pay text we collect
191 of 556 postings with comparable salary bands mention equity in collected pay text or stored summaries. 1 contain a quantified equity reference in that text. This is not a full-description audit: a missing mention does not establish that the employer offers no equity.
What the band leaves out
These comparisons use advertised annual USD base pay. Equity, annual bonuses and signing payments are separate components; their value and availability depend on the actual offer.
Separate guaranteed cash, target bonuses, annual vesting and one-off payments. External compensation benchmarks cannot establish the package for a particular listing.
Read the sourced compensation guide and recruiter checklist →
Only 60% of these jobs say what they pay
663 of the 1110 live postings state pay in some form. 447 say nothing at all and make you ask.
Of the 663 that do state something, 556 give an annual USD base band, and those are the only ones every figure above is computed from. The other 107 are excluded for being a different kind of number rather than for withholding one: 78 quote an hourly or daily rate, 19 publish in a currency other than dollars, 10 quote on-target earnings, which include commission or bonus. Those employers published their pay; it simply cannot be averaged with the rest without quietly distorting every number here.
Everything above is drawn only from the 556, so if the employers who publish a band skew toward the better-paying end, and they usually do, treat these as an optimistic read rather than a market average.
Free. One email on Thursdays.